Contact details

contact email address politicodaily@aol.co.uk

Monday, 21 October 2013

Greens Oppose Nuclear Gamble with Taxpayer Money

The proposed Hinkley Point nuclear-power station relies on a gamble with British taxpayers money, claims the South West Green Party. The Party has described a deal involving Chinese investment as an outrage. The deal would see the UK government offering to guarantee a level of return to Chinese investors that involves making a guess about the future market price for electricity. Since this is so uncertain, the whole project relies on British taxpayers taking the risk, say the Green Party.

Molly Scott Cato, Green Party lead candidate in the South West for next year's European elections, said: "The coalition government’s deal on the Hinkley Point nuclear power station really is a case of heads they win; tails we lose. Potential profits will now be offshored to China while the nuclear pollution will stay in the UK."

Greens are now looking to the EU, which they say may yet be able to block the deal. Professor Scott Cato, who is also the Green Party’s national finance speaker, went on to say: "Since the deal involves such a large investment of public money it will be investigated under the EU's state aid rules. Greens will work to expose the economic and environmental risks inherent in the proposal, and we are thankful that EU scrutiny may still avert this socially and environmentally damaging policy dreamed up in Westminster."

The Green Party is the only UK political party to be committed to phasing out nuclear power, following, they say, the example of the German Green Party. The Greens also say that the deal to build a nuclear power plant at Hinkley Point will mean higher energy bills and tie Britain into a costly and outdated technology for years to come, the Green MP for Brighton Pavilion said today, as she called on the National Audit Office to investigate. Caroline Lucas said it was “ridiculously generous” of the Government to guarantee the consortium building the new plant at Hinkley Point a strike price of almost twice the wholesale cost of electricity,

Dr Caroline Lucas, Green MP for Brighton Pavilion, said: "This is a terrible deal for billpayers. At a time when the costs of renewable energy are rapidly falling, this amounts to a ridiculously generous subsidy for the nuclear industry. Another key coalition agreement is being broken. There remain serious safety concerns about nuclear, and no safe, reliable solution for dealing with the toxic waste it creates. The Public Accounts Committee has already said that we are accumulating hazardous nuclear waste in outdated facilities which will cost nearly tens of billions to clean up."

Continuing Dr Lucas said "And on top of the possible costs of waste disposal, there could be a whole range of other costs to billpayers and taxpayers in future. Overseas investors will make massive profits from this deal, paid for by British billpayers. This deal will further increase the distance between those who profit from nuclear and those who pay for it. Instead of locking Britain into this costly and risky technology, the Government should be investing in energy efficiency and renewables, the costs of which are rapidly decreasing. The Government is giving the nuclear industry a guaranteed price for 35 years, but offshore wind could potentially be the UK’s cheapest power source within the next 15."

Earlier in the year, Dr Lucas and other MPs wrote to the National Audit Office calling for a review of the negotiations between the Government and EDF. She will now write to them calling on them calling for an investigation of the value for money of the strike price.