Universal Credit aims to ensure people will always be better off in work. As people’s take home pay increases from work, their Universal Credit will reduce gradually so they won’t lose all their benefits at once. There are no fixed hours thresholds, such as the 16 hours a week rule, so even working just a few hours a week will make a difference. Universal Credit will also introduce Real Time Information (RTI) to help employers manage their payroll and help their staff get the right benefit payments. When people are in work and their hours change their employer will report it on RTI and their Universal Credit payment will be adjusted accordingly.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Iain Duncan Smith said of these changes, “This Government is on the side of people who want to work hard and get on. Universal Credit is nothing less than the start of a fundamental cultural shift of the welfare system. This will revolutionise the way people experience the welfare state. It will make it easier for people to claim what they are entitled to but, more importantly, it will make it easier for people to move off benefits and into work.”
The Universal Credit pathfinder has begun in Ashton-under-Lyme to trail the new system with a limited number of people for six months before a gradual national roll out begins in October. The new system will be fully implemented by 2017.
DWP figures show that, even compared to working for 30 hours a week on the minimum wage, benefits – including housing – are only worth 79% of in-work income. This is supported by data compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to assess the 'replacement rate' for moving from benefits into work for dozens of household types. There is not one example of a household being better off on benefits. The challenge comes at the start of a week of renewed campaigning by the union on welfare issues, starting with a protest in Ashton-under-Lyne, where universal credit is being trialed.
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said: “If universal credit was being introduced to genuinely make life easier for people entitled to benefits it would be commendable, but the government’s pernicious language exposes its real intent is to demonise and punish them. We have shown that ministers are prepared to mislead and misdirect to drive through their welfare cuts so we are challenging Iain Duncan Smith and others to prove what they claim is true. The next time a minister says people are better off on benefits than in work, give them a pen and paper and ask them to show you how.”